Just had a migration where I was blocked by not having the msdyn_FSMNotifications solution installed in my target environment.
The secret behind it: this solution can only be installed on top of Woodford.
So after you have installed Woodford you’ll need to go to the Instance Picker and click on Install (or Upgrade if available) for Field Service, even if it is already installed. This way only some additional solutions will be installed. There you go!
There you can click “Reset” to get the below shown dialog window.
In this window you have the possibility to select an Office Security Group. This field is even pre-populated with the assigned Security Group of the currently selected Instance.
So what you are expecting is that while filling in this form you can use the field “Edit Security group” to assign a Security Group to your reset Instance by choosing the Security Group in this field.
BUUUUT: nothing of this is the case. This field simply has no functionality here.
Even when you click on the lookup pen symbol next to the field so that a popup shows all of your Office Groups and you can select whatever Group you want: for your new reset Instance you’ll always have NO Security Group at all assigned.
So why has Microsoft decided to put this field on this form if it has absolutely no functionality? – Nobody knows.
Please Microsoft, fix that and don’t let us hang with the common statement “works as designed”. Because the design in this point is really more than bad.
On Resco for Dynamics or Field Service Mobile Client you by default have this (in my opinion unnecessary) Signature field on every Note form.
So you might ask yourself why do you need the huge Signature area on each and every Note form. Usually it should be enough to capture Notes only on Work Orders and maybe for some special (custom) forms/processes. It confuses the End User if all he wants is adding an attachment or even only a text Note.
So what you can do is removing the Signature area by a simple On Can Execute rule on the Note form:
After you have configured this you would not see the Signature panel on a Note form anymore and also not the Signature command from the upper right burger menu of the Note form.
You can still configure one or more Signature sections for each of your forms as you already have it OOB on the Work Order form in FS Mobile.
Add Signature Tab to a Form
in Woodford, go to Entity where you want to add the Signature
click “Add Media”
Select “Capture Signature” and “Clear”
Optional: Provide “Required for Status”. Example: Status “Approved” only possible with Signature
Subject: Title of the Note
Similarly you can apply this for Photos, Videos, Files, … You could also have one Tab for Signature capturing and another Tab for Photo and/or Video capturing. Or collect multiple Signatures on one form by having different Tabs for that.
If you try to copy the OOB Bookable Resource form you might experience that some client side scripting doesn’t seem to be applied to your copied form anymore. Even when you haven’t done ANY other customizations except of copying it.
Strange as this usually doesn’t happen, right? If you have JS references you should have copied these references as well to your new form, right?
So when you dig deeper you’re finding that there now are business rules activated for the Bookable Resource form. I think this is rather new that MS delivers Business Rules out of the box. Fine for non-coders!!
The problem seems to be that the Business Rules here are set to scope “Information” which is only the one original OOB form, so your copy of it doesn’t inherit these Business Rules.
Another fascinating thing is that when you go into the Default Solution via old Solution explorer, you’ll see three business rules (above). When using Level Up (Browser Plugin), you’ll find 6 Business Rules taking effect here:
So you would need to go to the new maker experience to find / customize all 6 of them:
Next obstacle is: you can’t just change the scope of these Business Rules (I wouldn’t even know if this would be supported or not) as at least one of them has the Managed Property “Customizable” set to Flase:
Note: trying to customize from Business Rule “Show Enabled for Field Service Mobile field if Resource Type is User]” from within the new maker experience caused for me a state of no return, at least from make.powerapps.com: the BR got Deactivated and I could neither change it nor reactivate it anymore [improve@MS]. A resolution has luckily been to reactivate it from the old solution explorer (upper screenshot).
So what are you going to do to get the same behavior as on your OOB form also for your custom Resource form?
You need to copy the Business Rules delivered by Microsoft, than edit the Scope to your custom Form and activate the copies. In the end you would have it like this:
Tooltips that are defined once across all Schedulable Entities:
Resource Map Pins: Resource Tooltips View
Organizational Unit Map Pins: Organizational Unit Tooltips View
Tooltips individual per Schedulable Entity:
Requirement Map Pins (here also personal view possible): Requirement Map Pin Tooltips View
Booking Map Pin or Booking Tile: Booking Tooltips View
Note: the Booking Tile’s Booking Tooltips View in the Daily/Weekly and Monthly View are not customizable as of now [improve@MS].
Sliding out from the right after selecting an item.
Views that are defined once across all Schedulable Entities:
Resource Map Pin or Resource Card: Resource Details View
Organizational Unit Map Pin: Organizational Unit Details View
Views individual per Schedulable Entity:
Booking Map Pin or Booking Tile: Booking Details View
Requirement Map Pin or Requirement from Requirements List (here also personal view possible): Requirement Details View
Map View filter
Requirement Map Filter View
Determines which Requirements (Requirement Map Pins) are shown on the map.
only the filter, not the columns matter
is independent of the Views on the Requirements Panel /Requirement Lists)
if Apply Territory Filter from Tab parameters (gearwheel symbol) is set to yes, ADDITIONALLY the Territories of the filter fields will be applied to sort out the displayed Requirement Map Pins
Increase Booking width (zoom in): slider at the bottom right. This is saved for the Schedule Board Tab (for all users).
remove columns from List View directly: only temporarily/local, not saved.
make default schedule board not editable per Security Role
if the setting for a Schedule Board Tab from 2nd gearwheel, upper right corner, should be saved, the User needs update privileges for this Schedule Board Settings entity record. Changes would be visible for all other Users of this tab as well than. More information: Shared vs. personal Schedule Board (by Microsoft).
Create a new Client Extension record and associate it to the Schedule Board Setting record that contains your Schedule Board Tab or leave the Schedule Board Setting id field empty to have it affecting all Schedule Board Tabs .
Now I’m going to show you how these can be leveraged when using Work Orders.
Configure the Incident Type
create a Requirement Group Template as explained in above mentioned article
create a new Incident Type: Field Service=>Settings=>Incident Types=>”+ New”
Give the new Incident Type a name (my recommendation: provide a hint in the name that helps you later on to remember that this Incident Type is based on a Requirement Group):
4. On the Incident Type form, go to Related=>Requirement Groups 5. create a new Incident Type Requirement Group:
6. associate the formerly created Requirement Group Template to it via the lookup field 7. provide a name to the record and save it.
So you should finally get something like this:
Test it with a Work Order
Now its up to you to test the whole setup. For doing this you just need to create a new Work Order and fill in our new Incident Type into the field Primary Incident Type on the Work Order form:
Note: With a standard Field Service setup you necessarily need to provide the group based Incident Type in the field Primary Incident Type BEFORE you save the Work Order the first time. Otherwise you’ll get an error saying “You can’t add an incident that is related to a requirement group template to a work order if there is already a requirement related to this work order.”
Than you can check if your Requirements have correctly been associated with the Work Order. For doing so you need to go to: Related=>Requirements=> change the View to “Unsubmitted“:
Customization recommendation (especially if you more often have group based Requirements): create your own Resource Requirement view for the Work Order form.
And now the big moment comes: hit the Book button on top of the Work Order form:
You should now get search results according to the available Resources, the distance to the Service Location and the other parameters like Work Location, Organizational Unit, Resource Type and so forth:
Note: if you are going to use the same or a similar combination of Resources more often, it makes sense to create Requirement Group Templates whereas if you need a certain combination of Resources/Skills only one time it would theoretically be enough to create a Requirement Group without a Template. However it seems like if go down that road, you will not be able to associate your Requirement Group to a Work Order anymore later on. At least I couldn’t find a way to do that. That means that if you want your Users to be able to click the Book button on a Work Order and have the fancy algorithm execute its sophisticated multi-resource query, you will always need to create an Incident Type for it first and associate a Requirement Group Template to it.
What you can do is going back from a created Work Order that has a Requirement Group associated via =>Resource Requirement=>Requirement Group (or simply from the Field Service menu: Requirement Groups) and there editing the instance of the Requirement Group that is responsible for your Work Order. This method allows you to create a kind of a standard Incident Type Requirement Group and Template which you always use for creating a new Work Order when you want to leverage the Group functionality.
Cascading & sync of attributes within the Requirement Group
a) Cascading attribute changes from Work Order to Requirements
(as of Sept. 2019)
gets initially populated and auto-updated for the Resource Requirement with flag “Is Primary“ only:
Time From Promised/Time To Promised
Time Window Start/Time Window End
Service Territory (remove)
gets initially populated and auto-updated for all associated Resource Requirements:
Date Window Start/Date Window Start End (into fields From Date / To Date )
Service Territory (Create, Change)
b) Attributes kept in sync between Resource Requirements
Duration, From/To Date, <long/Lat, Work Location are always kept in sync within the Requirement Group, even when changed on a non-primary Requirement.
Service Territory however is only kept in sync, when it was changed from the Work Order AND the change was not a removal of the field content. So you can open the non-primary Requirements and assign different Territories to each.
As an example you might end up having Requirements like this in the end:
When asking yourself why is there a difference of cascading between Time Promised/Time Window vs. Date Window you can come to the assumption that it has to do with the Requirement Group functionality. If we check the UI (screen below) we can easily see that there are only the From Date / To Date fields (which are the counterparts to Date Window From /To from the Work Order). So Microsoft only takes care for a synchronization of these fields within a Requirement Group but not for the other Date/Time fields.
I was asking myself how can you have differing values in the Time Promised fields for Requirements of the same Requirement Group? As soon as you are scheduling or re-scheduling them, all of the Bookings based on these Requirements get moved simultaneously. However it could make sense if you have a scenario where a team gets a Booking for a longer period of time (i.e. traveling on site together) but the actual “ToDo” of a Resource would only be for a shorter time frame and you want to keep this information somewhere. If you are going to use it this way you should surely not create a hard booking restriction – for example with a Real Time Workflow – which forces you to not book outside of time promised from/to.
Also note that a Time From/To Promised on one of the non-primary Requirements will be ignored completely by the Schedule Assistant. However a Time From/To Promised on the Primary Requirement is a hard selection criteria for the Schedule Assistant, even if it doesn’t show these fields in the Filter panel, when scheduling a Requirement Group [improve@MS].
After we have taken a look into Resource Crews let’s now explore what Dynamics 365 Customer Engagement can offer with Requirement Groups.
create three Resources, each with differing skills: Go to Field Service=>Resources=>”+ New” and create a) One User with Skills: Flow, Hololens Know How. b) One Contact with Skill: Data Integration c) One Equipment with Skill: Hydraulic Lift
2. create a Requirement Group Template. Go to Field Service=>Resources=>Requirement Group Templates=>”+ New” a) provide a Name, save b) click into the first row from the subgrid and click “+ Requirement“ c) now add three requirements for getting back proposals for a team of three people and add corresponding skills d) at the Truck Resource click on Open Form to determine which Resource Type (Equipment in this case) you are expecting
Difference between Requirement Group and Requirement Group Template
A bit confusing is, that as soon as you open a Requirement Group Template form, the menu on the left jumps back as if you would have opened a Requirement Group instead of a Requirement Group Template. [improve@MS] Reason: technically Requirement Group and Requirement Group Template are the same entity msdyn_requirementgroup where only the records are differentiated by a flag called “Is Template”.
The title of the new-form “New Template: …” gives you the indicator that you’re creating a new template. But if you’re going to edit an existing Requirement Group Template you feel like editing a Requirement Group instead. I would therefore recommend to make the flag “Is Template” visible but read-only on the form.
If you pay close attention you recognize another difference: the lookup field Requirement Group Template is only visible on the Requirement Group form:
That brings us to the interoperability of the two: if you create a new Requirement Group the above mentioned field gets unlocked so you can choose a Requirement Group Template to start from.
Book a Requirement Group
If done with editing the requirements you can click the Book button directly from the Requirement Group ribbon:
This will open the Schedule Assistant with a list of appropriate Resource combinations. In our example the three Resources we have configured in step 1:
On the result list you than can
open each result row’s group to see its members
see which of the Requirements are going to be fulfilled by which of the found resources (last column)
adjust filter criteria and repeat search execution
book one of the groups by clicking on it => Book & Exit on the right flyout
If you’re not getting any results you should
probably need to adjust your search criteria
check if you have appropriate Resources in the system at all
check whether your Requirements do have a Service Territory associated but your Resources haven’t
Requirement Group in Schedule Board
If you now open the Schedule Board you could find something like this (too many Resources to have an easy overview):
Hovering over the booking panel (screenshot above) tells you that you have a Grouped Booking. So maybe you want to do a right click at the booking and choose Split View:
Shows you all bookings from this group (only those Resources which are on the same page of results, so you might want to increase the number of Resources per Page in Schedule Board tab settings and/or adjust your Resource filter to see all group members).
If you now drag and drop one of the bookings to a different starting time, all other bookings of this group will be shifted automatically too. Cool! That is what our customer wants! However compared to the same procedure with a Resource Crew you don’t see the shifting immediately happening on the board, instead you need to hit the refresh-button at the top of the Schedule Board tab once to see your bookings being shifted [improve@MS].
In Dynamics 365 Field Service you are able to create these types of Resources:
Resource Type: Equipment
Facility Equipment lookup appears and becomes mandatory after this Resource Type has been chosen.
Organizational Unit lookup becomes read only after this Resource Type has been chosen . Gets pulled from ‘Facility/Equipment’.’Organizational Unit’ or, if this is empty, than from ‘Project Parameters’.’Default Organizational Unit’.
Enabled for Field Service Mobile two option set disappears
in previous versions it was called Company Asset
makes sense to be used in a Resource Crew
for example: Truck, Excavator, Beamer, Hololens
Start Location & End Location cannot be set to Resource Address
Resource Type: Crew
Also see here for further details on how to set up a Crew.
After I have created a copy of an existing form I faced issues that some of the scripting provided by Microsoft didn’t work anymore. As long as I don’t get further insights into this I would recommend to be careful when taking this road. Better maybe to customize the existing form instead of creating a copy of it for customizations. This, by the way, is also a way that has proved to be more stable when it comes to upgrading your org with latest MS solution versions. We faced lots of scripting errors on forms that we previously have copied. It turned out that MS replaced the JS libraries for the original forms but not for your form copies during the last larger upgrade cycle.
Reachable in menu via Settings=> Business Management.
If you’re opening the form from Unified Interface you’ll see the lookup field Organizational Unit on the form.
But if you’re opening it from the former UI you’ll get another lookup field Site instead:
So is Organizational Unit the “newer” replacement for Site (at least when it comes to Field Service?
If you are creating a Bookable Resource with Resource Type Equipment than the Organizational Unit gets automatically populated from Facility/Equipment.’Organizational Unit’ into ‘Bookable Resource’.’Organizational Unit’.
There is a Work Hours ribbon button in Unified Interface:
In the new Unified Interface your surely stumbled already over this new Subgrid layout called “List View”:
This layout will change to the “old” Grid View as soon as you allow the section to have more horizontal space. This can be done by formatting the Form (or simply make your browser window wider).
This mechanism is called “Reflow”.
But did you know that you can also determine whether you want to display the Subgrid List View or the “old” Grid View by deactivating Reflow for a certain Subgrid?
Just open the parent Form in edit mode, double click on the Subgrid => Controls =>Add Control… => choose the “Read Only Grid”.
Than you can edit the property “Reflow behavior” to fix the Grid layout to the one or the other View type.
Another very nice feature is that you can customize the content displayed in the “List View” by creating a Card Form and referencing it in the Control properties (see above).
You would than be able to get something like this:
For that, create a new Form of the Type “Card” and adjust it as to your needs:
Up to now I couldn’t find out how to get the “Color Strip” working. I tried this without success. There is an Idea out there that indicates that it doesn’t work (yet?). So if you know more please let me know.
You can also add more than three columns into the Card’s body and additional fields into the Header and the Footer of the Card Form. To control whether the footer is expanded by default or not go to System Settings => “General” => “Set the default card state for Interactive Dashboards” => “Display cards in expanded state”. Sadly this setting can be done only once system wide.
But still, I’m really exited by the great capability to customize the List View.